USPTO serial 87671453
ELECTRONIC CURRENCY ORGANIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTRONIC CURRENCY ORGANIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine B. Redfield, Esq.
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in trading, transmitting, receiving, storing, and sending currency, tokens, and assets, and managing payments and exchange transactions involving currency, tokens, and assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing transfer of a currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; Financial services in the nature of providing management of financial assets and assets, namely, transmission of currency via electronic communication network; asset transactions, namely, currency exchange transaction services for transferrable cash equivalent units having a specified cash value; Providing financial risk management services for funds transfer, credit and debit card and check transactions via a global computer network; Providing financial risk management services for funds transfer, credit and debit card and check transactions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud-based software for use in trading, transmitting, receiving, storing, and sending currency, tokens, and assets, and managing payments and exchange transactions involving currency, tokens, and assets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECO PROJECT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ECO R&D LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Currency Organization, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ELECTRONIC CURRENCY ORGANIZATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |