Drawing for SYNTEK

USPTO serial 87677351

SYNTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Synthetic rubber, plastic and polymer extrusions for use in the further manufacture of closures for bottles and containersACTIVE
020Synthetic non-metal and non-paper closures for containers; stoppers of cork imitation; stoppers for bottles, not of glass, metal or rubber; imitation corks for bottles; stoppers of cork or cork imitations for jars and bottles; synthetic polymer caps and stoppers for use as closures for bottles; synthetic cork or cork imitation stoppers for bottlesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 31, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 31, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 31, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 31, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 1, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 16, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 16, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 11, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance