Drawing for B

USPTO serial 87680057

B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Purvi Patel Albers

Purvi Patel Albers Haynes and Boone LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Security and monitoring hardware for homes and businesses, namely, wire-free and wired monitoring and alarm monitoring systems and battery-powered and wired cameras and alarm monitoring systems; IP cameras for recording and transmitting video to mobile devices and PC devices; network-based devices, namely, sensors in the nature of temperature sensors, air quality sensors, and smoke detecting sensors, and video apparatus for recording and transmitting images and data; alarm units with triggering based on motion detection or other sensor inputs; control devices in the nature of computer hardware for communicating with IP cameras, alarms, and other sensor devices; computer hardware for remote video monitoring of homes and businesses for security and safety purposes; computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) with home and/or business security and monitoring hardware and softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 22, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 22, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 4, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 4, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 6, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 6, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 12, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 31, 2019INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Jan 30, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 19, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 12, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 27, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance