USPTO serial 87681360
QUICK GROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICK GROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina M. Lupino
Gina M. Lupino GML LAW CORPORATION D/B/A LUPINO LAW2300-1066 WEST HASTINGS STREETVANCOUVER, V6E3X2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fertilizers; retail store services featuring products, materials and equipment of others for cultivating, propagating, cloning, harvesting, and processing crops; retail store services featuring extraction equipment and supplies, pesticides, fungicides, moldicides, mildewcides, heating, ventilating, and air conditioning installations, units, and parts thereof of others; franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of retail stores featuring products, materials and equipment for cultivating, propagating, cloning, harvesting, and processing crops, and advice in the running of establishments as franchises; operation of a web site that provides consumer product information about products, materials and equipment for cultivating, propagating, cloning, harvesting, and processing crops; online retail store services featuring products, materials and equipment for cultivating, propagating, cloning, harvesting, and processing crops; hydroponic room design services for others, namely, interior and architectural design; creation of control programs, namely, software design and development for automated measurement and adjustment of electrical, humidity, and temperature controls systems for others; consulting services in relation to cultivating, propagating, cloning, harvesting, and processing plants, namely, agricultural advice, horticulture consulting services for the commercial farming industry and indoor and outdoor gardens; garden design services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |