USPTO serial 87681941
SILENTMODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILENTMODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Mesiti, Esq.
Nicholas Mesiti, Esq. HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio apparatus in the form of eye piece; audio apparatus in the form of eye mask; audio apparatus in the form of headphone; audio apparatus in the nature of a headgear adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; wearable audio apparatus in the nature of a headgear adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; sound systems in the form of a combination eye and ear mask; sound systems in the form of eye piece; sound systems in the form of eye mask; audio systems in the form of headphone; audio systems in the form of a combination eye and ear mask adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; wearable audio systems in the form of a combination eye and ear mask adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; and eye and ear masks with built-in audio device | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Therapeutic and assistive devices, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons in need thereof; wearable devices, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; headbands adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; eye bands adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; audio devices adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; apparatus, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears adapted for treatment or improvement of emotional, psychosomatic and/or biological function or condition of persons; systems, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears for improving emotional well-being of persons in need thereof therapeutically; systems and devices, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears adapted for improving emotional well-being of person; systems, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears; headbands or eye bands adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; systems, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears; audio devices adapted for improving emotional well-being of persons; and systems and apparatus, namely, eye and/or ear masks and headgears adapted for treatment or improvements of emotional, psychosomatic and/or biological function or condition of persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |