USPTO serial 87683012
AZHARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZHARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lafayette Hill, PA
Lafayette Hill, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Sisun, Esq.
Scott M. Sisun, Esq. Sisun Law135 Madison Avenue, Floor 5New York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Faucets; bathtubs; toilet seats; Roman tubs; sinks; showers; showerheads; shower and bath trim kit consisting primarily of showerhead, valve, lever handle, diverter, and spout; shower and bath PLUMBING FITTINGS, NAMELY, valves; hand-held showers; shower and bath diverters; shower and bath hoses; SHOWER slide bars | ABANDONED | Nov 27, 2017 |
| 021 | soap dispensers | ABANDONED | Dec 3, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |