USPTO serial 87683653
ALOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBYN S. LEDERMAN
ROBYN S. LEDERMAN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) precious metals and their alloys; jewelry medallions; necklaces, pendants; bracelets; jewelry chains, earrings; pearls; platinum; rings; jewelry boxes and containers made of precious metals or precious stones; works of art of precious metal; jewelry brooches; jewelry, precious stones; diamonds; semi-precious stones; cuff-links, tie-pins; tie clips; ornaments in the nature of jewelry made of precious metal or precious stones | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(e)) advertising precious metals and their alloys, jewelry, diamonds, precious and semi-precious stones, watches and gold products of others in communication media, for promotional purposes; organizing fashion shows and jewelry shows for others for commercial purposes; marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | (Based on 44(e)) financial analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | (Based on Intent to Use)(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) treatment of materials, namely, processing and polishing of diamonds, precious and semi-precious stones; manufacture of jewelry by processing precious metals and/or diamonds, precious and semi-precious stones; engraving; burnishing by abrasion; treating and processing leather; laser scribing and polishing of precious and semi-precious stones; providing information about the treatment of materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) testing, analysis and evaluation of diamonds, precious and semi-precious stones and jewelry with regard to character and quality, production, processing and finishing method, country of origin, processing and distribution chain between precious stone or precious metal being extracted and being introduced into the retail network for the purpose of certification; designing jewelry and goods of precious metals for others; hosting of web sites; interior design services; providing of Internet search engines; authenticating works of art; industrial design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALO jewelry CZ, s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by ALO jewelry CZ, s.r.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALOVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |