USPTO serial 87684090
TRAVELLER'S FRIEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAVELLER'S FRIEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Wise
ROBERT J. WISE WISES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION586 ARGUS ROAD, 200SUITE 200OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, L6J3J3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ginger snaps, cocoa snaps and spelt ginger snaps; cereal-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |