USPTO serial 87686686
MICRO FULFILLMENT CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRO FULFILLMENT CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP8110 GATEHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100 EASTFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for providing logistics services for online customers; Software for managing delivery and automatic collection of goods; Software for administrating a network of automated warehouses; Warehouse management software | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | warehouse storage; rental of warehouses; rental of warehouse space; storage of goods in warehouses; providing information relating to the rental of warehouse space; provision of storage facilities in a warehouse or other building; storage services; Logistics services consisting of the storage, transportation and delivery of goods; logistics services for online customers, namely, delivery of goods for online customers; Logistics services provided through the use of robots for transportation of goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for delivering goods for purchases made online; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for delivering goods through the use of robots; Product development and engineering services for others, namely, in the field of logistics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CommonSense Robotics Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICRO FULFILLMENT CENTER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |