Drawing for MERCHANT'S CRAFT

USPTO serial 87687525

MERCHANT'S CRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERCHANT'S CRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Zeimantz

JOHN R. ZEIMANTZ FELTMAN EWING, P.S.421 W RIVERSIDE AVE STE 1600SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato chipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 15, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 20, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance