USPTO serial 87689135
AI ADVISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AI ADVISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorri W Cooper
Lorri W Cooper Law Artisans LLC387 Wakefield Run Blvd.Hinckley, OH 44233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases, artificial intelligence for analysis of databases, financial analysis, detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches, auditing, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating employee risk scores, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC); downloadable computer software for auditing, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breach | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computer-implemented data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases; computer implemented business auditing; business risk management; financial auditing using computer-implemented data analysis; risk management in the field of providing employee risk scores and governance, risk and compliance (GRC); case management relating to business auditing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | provision of artificial intelligence in the nature of online non-downloadable software for analysis of databases in the field of finance; electronic monitoring of credit card activity using computer-implemented data analysis to detect fraud; monitoring of computer systems using computer-implemented data analysis to detect unauthorized access and data breaches; computer-implemented energy auditing; financial risk management; computer software design and updating; computer software consulting; providing online non-downloadable computer software for auditing, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |