USPTO serial 87689774
LINX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with LINX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Paskar
Mark A. Paskar Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Custom design and engineering of commercial and industrial products, machines, and subassembly products in the fields of consumer electronics, solar energy technology, automobiles, smart vending machines, commercial beverage equipment, packaging equipment, automated assembly equipment, medical equipment, industrial milling machines, human mobility products, chemical proportioning equipment, and telecommunications, all to the order and specification of others; computer-aided design for others; industrial design services for others; mechanical engineering services for others; electrical engineering services for others; consulting in the field of designing tools, machinery, and consumer and industrial products; graphic design services for others; packaging design for others; product quality testing for others; computer simulation for others based on computer programs; quality control for others | ACTIVE | Feb 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |