USPTO serial 87690402
EDGE MAPPING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGE MAPPING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad Bertoglio
BRAD BERTOGLIO INTELINK LAW GROUP PCONE MARKET STREET, SPEAR TOWER, 36TH FL.SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for the collection, compilation, processing, transmission and dissemination of positioning data for the autonomous operation and navigation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Computer software and hardware for the collection, compilation, processing, transmission and dissemination of data from geographic, map and crowd source information by processing signals from sensors and other signal generating devices; Computer software and hardware for operating and controlling mobile robotic devices, and autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles; Computer software and hardware for autonomous navigation, and assisted driving by mobile robotic devices and vehicles; interactive computer software that provides roadway, navigation, geographic, map and travel information; interactive computer software enabling creation or updating of computerized data models of an environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Services for navigation and geolocation based on interactive digital maps, interactive sensors, crowd sourcing, and other signal generating devices; Providing an online interactive database utilizing sensors and other signal generating devices to enable, enhance and augment data relating to the navigation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Providing an online interactive database for collecting, compiling, processing, transmitting and disseminating data relevant to positioning and navigation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for controlling sensors and other signal generating devices to enable, enhance and augment data relating to the autonomous operation and navigation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Providing an online interactive database utilizing sensors and other signal generating devices to enable, enhance and augment data relating to the autonomous operation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Providing an online interactive database for collecting, compiling, processing, transmitting and disseminating data relevant to control and operation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Providing software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for collecting, compiling, processing, transmitting and disseminating data relevant to positioning, navigation, control and operation of mobile robotic devices and vehicles; Providing scientific and technological services, namely, research and design services in the field of autonomous control of vehicles, autonomous driving of vehicles, autonomous navigation, assisted driving, route planning and geolocation; Mapping services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLFICE RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLFICE RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EDGE MAPPING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |