Drawing for OLYCEL

USPTO serial 87691217

OLYCEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLYCEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Taylor

CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR HOOPER HATHAWAY, P.C.126 SOUTH MAIN STREETANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephone services, transmission of voice, data, and documents via telecommunications networks, providing prepaid and postpaid minutes for use on cell phones abroad, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of cellular and satellite transmissions and broadband, copper, and optical or wireless networks; internet service provider services; cellular network services, namely, providing communications via fiber optic networks, cellular telephone communication services; satellite communications services; wireless, digital, and electronic transmission of audio, voice, video, data, and information via satellite and terrestrial networks; providing user access to data transmission and reception services, namely, providing user access to global computer networks; providing access to telecommunications infrastructures for others; telecommunication access services; wireless, digital, and electronic data transmission and data broadcasting, namely, transmission of data by satellite, wireless networks, mobile wireless networks, global computer networks, and broadband networks; electronic data interchange services, personal communications servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 12, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 12, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 12, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance