Drawing for PEAQUE

USPTO serial 87691353

PEAQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEAQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles N. Quinn

Charles N. Quinn FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. #3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing communication services between patients and physicians, namely, transmission of information by data communications respecting patient condition and patient compliance with prescribed regimens via the Internet; providing physician-patient telecommunication services, namely, transmission of audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet to provide visual indications of patient condition and optionally recording and memorializing patient-physician communications via the Internet; communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks respecting driver alertness evaluation and providing visual indicia of the same via the Internet; providing physician-patient communication services for patient education, namely, providing access to third party knowledge base providers via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance