Drawing for BEYOND THE BEDLINER

USPTO serial 87691564

BEYOND THE BEDLINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND THE BEDLINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie R. Fenstermaker

Julie R. Fenstermaker BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP200 PUBLIC SQUARESUITE 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002coatings to protect surfaces against corrosion and impact for use in automotive, boating, construction, manufacturing, commercial and industrial applications; floor coatings; concrete coatings, namely, protective coatings for concrete; top coatings for application to polymer surfaces, namely, spray-on truck bedliners; spray-on polyurethane and polyurea coating to protect surfaces against corrosion and impact for use in the automobile and truck industry; waterproof and protective coatings for patios and decks; waterproof and protective coatings for building foundations and basements; waterproof and protective coatings for concrete, metal fiberglass and woodACTIVE—
037protective coating application services, namely, the spray application of protective coatings on automotive, truck, boat and trailer surfaces, and on automotive parts and accessories; application of waterproof and protective coatings for patios, decks, foundations, and basementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 31, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 31, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance