USPTO serial 87691720
PREDICTIVEIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREDICTIVEIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany J. Maxey-Fisher
BRITTANY J. MAXEY-FISHER Maxey-Fisher, PLLC100 Second Avenue South, Suite 401 NorthSt. Petersburg, FL 33701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consulting services that are customized for each client; Computer monitoring services for proper functioning, detecting breakdowns, unauthorized access and data breach; Computer network monitoring services for proper functioning, detecting breakdowns, unauthorized access and data breach; Technical support services, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; Computer hardware and computer software maintenance services; Computer rental services; Software rental services; Computer software services; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting infrastructure software; Remote computer network technical monitoring namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems and remote software maintenance services; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting services in the field of identification, support, and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Computer consultation in the field of computer security in the field of secured laptop, email protection, email archiving, web filtering, computer firewall, computer virus scanning software, wireless information security and vulnerability analysis; Consulting in the field of information technology; Design and development of networks namely wireless computer networks for others; Integration of computer systems and networks; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology systems of others; Information technology monitoring updates for computers, programs and software for businesses; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Computer disaster recovery services; Cloud based information technology services, namely, providing use of a non-downloadable cloud-based software for monitoring data and computer-based information systems for businesses; Information security and compliance solution services for small and medium businesses, namely, secured laptop, email protection, email archiving, web filtering, computer firewall, computer virus scanning software, wireless information security and vulnerability analysis; Consulting in the field of information technology for healthcare providers | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |