Drawing for BLUELYNX

USPTO serial 87691738

BLUELYNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUELYNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for smart phones; Downloadable mobile applications for access controlACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2019PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 28, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 18, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 18, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance