Drawing for ARCHETYPE

USPTO serial 87691892

ARCHETYPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCHETYPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K. FORD DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 EIGHTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting public interest and awareness of the importance of mentorship and empowerment of young individuals for the purpose of social change and community impact; promoting public awareness of issues in higher education, diversity, leadership, public policy, the humanities, and social, cultural, and economic mattersACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, arranging, organizing and conducting conferences, symposiums, seminars, forums, classes, and workshops, focusing on the development of concepts and skills that encourage qualities such as mentorship, leadership, and entrepreneurship; distributing course, educational, or training materials in connection therewith; providing non-downloadable videos and online publications in the nature of books, brochures, monographs, newsletters, pamphlets, and reports in the field of the humanities and social, cultural and economic issues; providing recognition and incentives through ceremonies and events for the purpose of distributing awards and helping individuals secure scholarships, seed funding, continued mentorship, internships and other academic and professional opportunitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance