Drawing for BIM.COM

USPTO serial 87692968

BIM.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIM.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Harley Blosser

G HARLEY BLOSSER SANDBERG PHOENIX & VON GONTARD PC120 S CENTRAL AVENUESUITE 1600ST LOUIS, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, facilitating the transaction of business via local and global computer networks by providing computerized online ordering services featuring cloud-based design and construction applications for the construction and building markets which allows developers to sell software solutions to professional users such as architects, engineers, designers, and project managers; Dissemination of advertising of goods and services of others via local and global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 9, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 12, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance