USPTO serial 87695277
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2020
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,275
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Housey
Janice Housey Litmus Law PLLC4 Weems Lane #240Winchester, VA 22601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases, computer software for analysis of databases, financial analysis, detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches, auditing, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating employee risk scores, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC); downloadable computer software for auditing, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computer-implemented business data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases; computer-implemented business auditing; business risk management; financial auditing using computer-implemented data analysis; risk management in the field of providing employee risk scores and governance, risk and compliance (GRC); case management relating to business auditing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | provision of artificial intelligence in the nature of online non-downloadable software for analysis of databases in the field of finance; electronic monitoring of credit card activity using computer-implemented data analysis to detect fraud; monitoring of computer systems using computer-implement data analysis to detect unauthorized access and data breaches; computer-implemented energy auditing; computer software design and updating; computer software consulting; providing online non-downloadable computer software for auditing, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mindbridge Analytics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mindbridge Analytics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mindbridge Analytics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |