Drawing for NEXT GENERATION CRACK SEALANTS

USPTO serial 87695709

NEXT GENERATION CRACK SEALANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEXT GENERATION CRACK SEALANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Tingey

DAVID B. TINGEY KIRTON MCCONKIE36 S. STATE STREET, SUITE 1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Asphalt-based coatings and sealants for use on roofs, walls, bridges, and pavementsACTIVEDec 31, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 14, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 12, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 12, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance