USPTO serial 87697815
VSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYER, DAVID COREY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Juan Carlos A. Marquez
JUAN CARLOS A. MARQUEZ MARQUEZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE, PLLC1629 K STREET, NWSUITE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | chemical preparations for the diagnosis of pregnancy; chemical preparations for the diagnosis of hepatitis; chemical reagents for medical or purposes; diagnostic preparations for medical purposes; preparations for medical detection purposes, bandages for dressings; cotton swabs and cotton sticks for medical purposes; adhesive tapes and adhesive bands for medical purposes; antiseptic cotton; cotton for medical purposes; lint for medical purposes; moleskin for medical purposes; absorbent cotton and absorbent wadding; rings for medical purposes; and wristbands for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2017 |
| 009 | computer operating programs, recorded; computer software; spectrograph apparatuses; biological chip readers; biological chip inspection machines; biological chips; DNA chips; gene chips; instruments for laboratory use; signal converters; analogy to digital converters; chips; reticles; circuits; wafers; resistance meters; galvanometers; conductivity meters; electronic micrometers; current meters; impedance meters; analyzers; photometers; spectrometers; exposure meters and light meters; precision measuring apparatuses; material testing instruments; and automatic optical inspection machines | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2017 |
| 010 | dialyzers; blood analyzers; blood testing apparatuses; medical detection equipment; blood sugar machines; blood urea nitrogen analyzers; sarcosine analyzers; syringes and injectors for medical purposes; medical examination desks; probes for medical purposes; testing apparatuses for medical purposes; electrodes for medical use; medical electrode pads; medical immunoassay analyzers; urine check instruments; medical equipment; and diagnostic apparatuses for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |