USPTO serial 87703319
ADUROSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANDER, DREW M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADUROSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
frederick samuels
frederick samuels cahn & samuels, llp1100 17th st., NWsuite 401washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Light systems comprising light sensors and switches; Light switches; Lighting control apparatus; Programmable controls for lighting apparatus; Lighting control software for use in commercial and industrial facilities; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in remotely controlling lighting in commercial and residential buildings; Computer software for the remote control of electric lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; Computer-controlled lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |