Drawing for MBLOCK

USPTO serial 87703982

MBLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORAN, CAROLINE L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MBLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Patel

ALEX PATEL PATEL & ALMEIDA, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD. SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Children's educational software; Blank electronic chip cards; Electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; Computer operating software, namely, mobile applications for booking taxis, downloadable application software used for educational training, downloadable application software for controlling electronic building blocks; downloadable application software for controlling intelligent toys and toy robots; none of the aforementioned goods for use in connection with components used in the field of fluid measuring, drive, control and regulating technologyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 2, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 10, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 10, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 4, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance