USPTO serial 87704590
CYBEREASON PROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBEREASON PROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachelle A. Dubow, Esq.
RACHELLE A. DUBOW, ESQ. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE FEDERAL STREETATTN: TMSUBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in threat prevention, detection, investigation, response, remediation and analysis for computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; computer software for preventing viruses and unauthorized access to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; computer software for managing computer network endpoint security and predicting and monitoring security threats to computer networks; computer software for preventing unauthorized access to computers and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Conducting seminars and conferences in the field of cyber security; educational services, namely, providing educational speakers in the field of cyber security | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for detecting, and protecting against, cyber-attacks; Software as a service (SAAS) services for managing computer security and endpoint security; computer security services in the nature of monitoring, analysis and reporting, and threat hunting for protecting data and information from unauthorized access; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy, namely, in person consultation in the field of cybersecurity and on the implementation and ongoing use of cybersecurity software; software as a service (SAAS) services for use in threat prevention, detection, investigation, response, remediation and analysis for computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; software as a service (SAAS) services for preventing viruses and unauthorized access to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; software as a service (SAAS) services for predicting and monitoring security threats to computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services for preventing unauthorized access to computers and computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services for data analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cybereason Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cybereason Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBEREASON PROTECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |