CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IT'S ALL GOOD

USPTO serial 87704819

IT'S ALL GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BETTS, MARCYA N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S ALL GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NATHAN J. GUGLIOTTA

NATHAN J. GUGLIOTTA GUGLIOTTA & GUGLIOTTA, LPAP.O. Box 38536Olmsted Falls, OH 44138United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, non-medicated liquid soap, cream soap, non-medicated waterless soap, bar soap, bath soap, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2026NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 19, 2026EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 19, 2026DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 18, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2025EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2025ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2025DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 17, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2024TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 19, 2024OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 19, 2024OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 23, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 9, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance