Drawing for CAIDENCE

USPTO serial 87707309

CAIDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAIDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harris A. Wolin

HARRIS A. WOLIN MYERS WOLIN, LLC100 HEADQUARTERS PLAZAWest Tower, Floor 7MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960-6834

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of medication; Computer hardware and software for monitoring use of and controlling access to medication; machines for dispensing dosages of medication into pill boxesACTIVE—
021Pill boxes for personal use; lockable pill boxes for personal useACTIVE—
042software as a service for monitoring and controlling access to medication; software as a service for the monitoring by patients, family members, pharmacists, prescribers, or healthcare systems of medication use by patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance