Drawing for SMART COMMERCE

USPTO serial 87707505

SMART COMMERCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART COMMERCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph S. Makuch

JOSEPH S MAKUCH INTERSECT IPPO BOX 8436PORTLAND, OR 97207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collecting data, processing data, analyzing data, generating data, and displaying dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 26, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 5, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 1, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 1, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 11, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 11, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance