Drawing for EASY POUR

USPTO serial 87707717

EASY POUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY POUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

MICHAEL G FREY WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STREETCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Automotive lubricants; Automotive greases; Motor oilsACTIVESep 28, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 29, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance