USPTO serial 87708758
DRAGONFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ARANT, LUCY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRAGONFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peng Li
LINNA CHEN MAGSTONE LAW4633 OLD IRONSIDES DRIVESUITE 160LOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for sensing driving environment of a self-driven vehicle or autonomous vehicle for guiding navigation of the self-driven vehicle or autonomous vehicle; Computer hardware for sensing objects for guiding navigation of a self-driven vehicle or autonomous vehicle; Computer hardware for sensing the driving environment such as objects in the driving environment of a self-driven vehicle or autonomous vehicle for guiding navigation of the self-driven vehicle or autonomous vehicle; Navigation apparatus for self-driven vehicles, autonomous cars, autonomous drone applications and robotics in the nature of on-board computer; Electronic sensors used in autonomous cars for sensing driving environment such as objects in the driving environment for guiding navigation of self-driven vehicles, autonomous vehicles; computer software and hardware used in a robot or autonomous car for sensing driving environment such as objects in the driving environment during its navigation for guiding navigation of the robot or autonomous car; Electronic sensors such as cameras, radars, lidars, infrared sensors, GPS, speed sensor, and/or ultrasonic sensors used in autonomous cars for sensing driving environment for guiding navigation of self-driven vehicles, autonomous vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |