Drawing for IMPACT DILIGENCE

USPTO serial 87709414

IMPACT DILIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 612
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPACT DILIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason Saul

200 N LASALLE ST #2650CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Assays for research purposesACTIVE—
035Public policy research servicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 24, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 24, 2019PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
May 15, 2019ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 23, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance