Drawing for ECOGNITION

USPTO serial 87710042

ECOGNITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOGNITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea Anderson

Andrea Anderson Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark docketingDenver, CO 80201-8749

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer programs and computer software for geospatial information extraction and geospatial data analysisACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 26, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 20, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2020ISIUWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE(NOA)-ITU REQUEST
Aug 7, 2020FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE
Jul 31, 2020ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 28, 2020DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION
Jul 28, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 28, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 24, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 26, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 26, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 21, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance