Drawing for CONSTRURAMA

USPTO serial 87710725

CONSTRURAMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSTRURAMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Espenshade

STEVEN M. ESPENSHADE PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 CONGRESS AVENUESUITE 2120AUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; Issuing of payment gift cards; issuing stored value cards; issuing prepared credit and debit cards and tokens of value; Providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership card; Money transfer services utilizing electronic cards; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; information and advisory services relating to all of the aforesaidACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance