USPTO serial 87712067
TFC - TOTAL FISHERY CHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TFC - TOTAL FISHERY CHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gresik, Jawa Timur, ID
Gresik, Jawa Timur, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ramon Gras
Ramon Gras LAW OFFICE OF RAMON GRAS, LLC210 AUGUST STREETEASTON, MD 21601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for searching local restaurants and merchants offering sustainable seafood and seafood based products, and for querying databases for information concerning certified sustainable seafood and seafood base products, and presenting the results to users; Downloadable electronic information and publications, in the nature of books, magazines, forms, manuals, certificates, pamphlets, posters, newsletters, journals, periodicals, calendars, leaflets, and brochures in the fields of fish and fish products, fishing, cooking, restaurants, and ecology; none of the aforesaid for use in relation to computer simulation and computer engineering analysis | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2019 |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, brochures, periodicals, newsletters, journals, calendars, and leaflets in the fields of fish and fish products, fishing, cooking, restaurants, and ecology | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2019 |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting public awareness of sustainable fishing and seafood harvesting practices and seafood traceability; Marketing services in the nature of developing marketing campaigns and initiatives for sustainable fishing and seafood harvesting practices and seafood traceability; Promoting public awareness of sustainable fishing and seafood harvesting practices and seafood traceability; Promoting sustainable fishing and seafood harvesting by means of arranging and conducting incentive reward programs for fisheries and seafood harvesters; Providing an on-line searchable database featuring business and consumer product information about sustainable seafood and seafood-based products and certified fisheries and seafood harvesters; Providing business advice and consultancy in the field of sustainable seafood standards and methodologies in the fields of fishing, seafood and dietary supplement industries | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2017 |
| 040 | Providing food processing information, advice and consultancy in the field of fish processing management and methodologies; Providing food processing information, advice and consultancy in the field of sustainable seafood standards and methodologies; edible fish processing services and information, advice and consultation to others in the field of the processing of fish | ACTIVE | May 15, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PT. Kelola Mina Laut
- Other trademarks owned by PT. Kelola Mina Laut
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named TFC - TOTAL FISHERY CHAIN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |