Drawing for OMNIVERSE

USPTO serial 87713080

OMNIVERSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMNIVERSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOPE V SHOVEIN

HOPE V SHOVEIN BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CENTER22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer programs for facilitating user interaction between businesses and consumers for their products and services across multiple messaging or social media channels, virtual assistant and web-based channels using cognitive artificial intelligence; downloadable computer software applications and downloadable software for facilitating user interaction between businesses and consumers for their products and services across multiple messaging or social media channels using cognitive artificial intelligence that allows voice controlled digital assistants to interact via text or verbally within messaging or social media applications; none of the foregoing for use with point-of-sale payment terminals, cash calculating machines, cash dispensing machines, or terminals for electronically processing credit card paymentACTIVE—
042Cognitive Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS) featuring cloud-based computer software platforms that enable consumers to deploy a dialogue-driven software system that uses voice-controlled digital assistants and cognitive artificial intelligence to facilitate user interaction between businesses and consumers for their products and services across multiple messaging or social media applications and web based channels; none of the foregoing for use with point-of-sale payment terminals, cash calculating machines, cash dispensing machines, or terminals for electronically processing credit card paymentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 28, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 28, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 18, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 25, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 17, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 29, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 29, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
May 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 29, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance