Drawing for RUMBLE

USPTO serial 87713524

RUMBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUMBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott M. Sisun, Esq.

Scott M. Sisun, Esq. Sisun Law135 Madison Avenue, Floor 5New York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, pants, drawstring pants, sweat pants, shorts, exercise tights, shirts, short sleeve shirts, tops, sleeveless tops, thermal shirts, long-sleeve tops, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sports bras, jackets, hooded pullovers; headwear, namely, headbands and hats; undergarments, socks, bandanas, wristbands; shoes and flip flopsACTIVEJul 15, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 21, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance