USPTO serial 87716580
AGGRANDIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGGRANDIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Van Dyke
Raymond Van Dyke VAN DYKE LAW1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NWWASHINGTON SQUARE, PO BOX 65302WASHINGTON, DC 20035Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical fiber transporting video, voice and data communications signals through DWDM signal connectivity products, systems and components networked as fiber cross-connects, interconnects or termination points between fiber links consisting of one or more fiber strands interacted with communication equipment, and components thereof, namely, fiber optic cables, fiber optic patch electrical cords, fiber optic cable assemblies comprising fiber optic cables and electrical wires, and fiber optic cable connectors, mountings for fiber optic cables, fiber optic distribution hubs, fiber optic distribution frames, and fiber optic patch panels for scanning, monitoring and managing cable connections in telecommunications network systems; multi-dwelling unit mounting telecommunications data distribution racks, cabinets and wall-enclosures specially adapted for housing telecommunications hardware; computer software for monitoring, analyzing, operating, managing and maintaining fiber optic networks, systems, IP switch and router equipment and components; copper data communication and connectivity products, systems and components used to inter-network through cross-connects at Data Centers, interconnect terminate copper and fiber-based transmission lines, namely, copper electrical cables and optical cables for the transmission and networking of video, voice, data and Internet through use of copper or optic patch cords, copper or optic cable connectors; mounting frames specially adapted for communication broadband and IP Ethernet transmission apparatus; communication racks for mounting telecommunications hardware, patch panels for housing electrical connections in telecommunications network systems; copper/fiber plug connectors; jacks and jack fields in the nature of electrical sockets, termination plasma display panels, communication distribution mounting frames and Internet-working LCD panels, all specially adapted for use with communication transmission apparatus; patch and splice fiber optic component enclosures for accessing fiber and copper cables directed into high rise business building structures and houses using photonic optical networks fiber optic components and enclosures for termination or splicing fiber optic cables, namely, splices for fiber optic cables; optical splitter or coupler modules, namely, cassettes in the nature of networking hardware enclosures that house splitting devices for fiber optic cables, cable assemblies, adapters, adapter panels, and attenuators; fiber optic distribution hubs, namely, fiber optic distributing electrical, connection boxes, hand hole electrical connector housings and drop/insert fiber filters for optical devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AGGRANDIZER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |