USPTO serial 87718008
FIRST BANK CHICAGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 2019
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with FIRST BANK CHICAGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
Highland Park, IL
Other trademarks owned by Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
Highland Park, IL
Other trademarks owned by Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Parks
Kevin Parks LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER LTD.Two Prudential Plaza,180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Bank of Highland Park Financial Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST BANK CHICAGO CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FIRST BANK CHICAGO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 8, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |