USPTO serial 87719393
BIG ROCK BREWERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG ROCK BREWERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patchen M. Haggerty
Patchen M. Haggerty PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | (Based on Intent to Use) Beer (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |