USPTO serial 87719488
MECACYL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MECACYL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
33610 CESTAS, FR
33610 CESTAS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1001 TEXAS AVE., STE. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Anti-friction chemical additives for gasoline, fuel, lubricants for use with mechanical components and engines; chemical additives for lubricants; transmission oil; chemical additives for oils; chemical additives for industrial oils; chemical substances for use as additives to industrial lubricating oils; chemical motor oil additives; chemical additives for greases; chemical additives for industrial greases; chemical substances for use as additives to industrial lubricating greases; chemical additives for the flow control of grease; detergent additives for fuels; chemical additives to motor fuel; chemical additives for lubricants; detergent additives for lubricants; chemical additive concentrates for motor fuels; chemical additives for petroleum products; chemical additives for hydraulic fluids; chemical additives for diesel fuels; chemical additives for use in fuels to inhibit corrosion; detergent additive for use with motor oil; chemical additives for drilling fluids; chemical additives for frost protection; chemical additives for transmission fluids; chemical additives for fuel treatment; chemical additives for use in the production of lubricants; chemical additives for engine cooling systems; chemical additives for use with internal combustion engine fuels; fuel injection cleaner chemical additive; chemical additives for oils, gasoline, fuels, drilling muds for use in the drilling of subterranean oil wells; additives for raising the cetane number of diesel fuel; chemical additives for oil well drilling fluid; additives for raising the octane number in petrol; octane booster fuel chemical additive; chemical additives for fuel injection system cleaners; chemical preparations for use as additive to fuels for combating pollution; chemical additives for the production metal working fluids; chemical additives for enhancing the performance of lubricating oils, greases and internal combustion engine fuels | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Industrial oils and greases; industrial lubricants; graphite as a lubricant; lubricating greases; fuel, motor fuels and lighting fuel; motor vehicle lubricants; all-purpose lubricants; lubrication grease for vehicles; lubricating oils and greases; lubricating oils for hydraulic suspensions; lubricating oils for hydraulic circuits; hydraulic lubricating oils for brake circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |