USPTO serial 87721600
THE AMARA PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE AMARA PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Foster City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Soyeun D. Choi
SOYEUN D. CHOI SOYEUN D. CHOI, ESQ., PC969 G EDGEWATER BLVD314FOSTER CITY, CA 94404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to access and create content featuring entertainment and educational content; online publications, namely, blogs, articles and e-newsletters in the fields of health, wellness, relationships, personal finance, retirement, travel, volunteering and general interest; educational services, namely, providing online classes in the fields of health, wellness, relationships, personal finance, retirement, travel, and general interest.; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to organize groups and events, participate in discussions, share experiences, and engage in social and community networking; Computer services, namely, hosting electronic facilities for others for organizing and conducting meetings, events and interactive discussions; Application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software to enable or facilitate the uploading, downloading, streaming, posting, displaying, blogging, linking, modifying, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over communication networks; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for social networking, creating a virtual community, and transmission of audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data; Computer services in the nature of providing customized online pages featuring user-defined or specified information, personal profiles, audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer and communication networks; Providing online sites that give users the ability to upload, modify and share audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data.; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to create an online community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form connections and engage in social networking.; Developing customized web pages featuring user-defined information | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |