Drawing for WF

USPTO serial 87722402

WF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Graff

Christopher L. Graff PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Online journals, namely, blogs, concerning cooking, nutrition, grocery shopping, food, wine, health, and wellness; providing online portals for entertainment, namely, providing an online computer gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 21, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 21, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 11, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2019ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2019CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 8, 2019EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 2018ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance