USPTO serial 87722729
WEEEMAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEEEMAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hui Zhang
HUI ZHANG RABIN & BERDO, PC1101 14TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Bolts of metal; Nails; Nuts of metal; Rivets of metal; Screws of metal | ACTIVE | Nov 25, 2017 |
| 007 | Electric generators and related equipment, namely, automatic standby electric generator sets; Industrial robots; Motor starters | ACTIVE | Nov 25, 2017 |
| 009 | Alarm sensors; Batteries; Battery chargers; Computer game software; Computer operating programs; Cruise controls for motor vehicles; Electronic integrated circuits; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Infrared sensors; LCDs; Optical sensors; Photoelectric sensors; Proximity sensors; Remote control starters for vehicles; Ultrasonic sensors; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, back-up sensors and cameras | ACTIVE | Nov 25, 2017 |
| 028 | Battery operated action toys; Electronic learning toys; Electronic toy vehicles; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Model toy vehicles; Remote controls for toy cars; Toy construction blocks; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy robots; Toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys | ACTIVE | Nov 25, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEEEMAKE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WEEEMAKE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |