USPTO serial 87723168
ARMLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARMLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela N. Hirschman
Pamela N. Hirschman SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Non-surgical medical devices for the treatment of tennis elbow, namely, lateral epicondylitis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |