Drawing for RESECURITY IMMUNITY

USPTO serial 87723287

RESECURITY IMMUNITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESECURITY IMMUNITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marlene J. Williams

Marlene J. Williams NIXON PEABODY LLPP.O. BOX 26769SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-6769UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer anti-virus software; next-generation computer anti-virus software; Software for protection of electronic data from unintended or unauthorized access, change or destructionACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of computer anti-virus software and next-generation computer anti-virus software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for protection of electronic data from unintended or unauthorized access, change or destruction; updating and maintaining cloud-based computer software through on-line updates, enhancements and patches; technical support services, namely, installation, administration, and troubleshooting of computer applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance