USPTO serial 87723715
XENON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XENON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
JONATHAN G. MORTON MORTON & ASSOCIATES, LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances in the nature of laundry bleach and laundry additives for water softening all for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, namely, cleaning preparations for cleansing drains, dry cleaning preparations, all purpose cleaning preparations, polishing wax, scouring solutions and general use abrasives; bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; bath body soaps; non-medicated liquid soaps for hands and face; cosmetic soaps; fragrances and perfumery; essential oils for the manufacture of perfumes; essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes, essential oils for aromatherapy; cosmetics; makeup; eye makeup; eyeliners; blushers; lipsticks; hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunication access services, digital network telecommunications services, transmission of webcasts and podcasts, providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of voices, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic transmission of data; electronic transmission of images, photographs, graphic images and illustrations over a global computer network; transmission of data, audio, video and multimedia files by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; video on demand transmissions; providing access to digital music websites on the internet; provision of access to the Internet; provision of access to a global computer network; video on demand transmission services; webcasting of fashion shows; provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video on demand service; satellite communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |