USPTO serial 87725401
DERQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with DERQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ann Arbor, MI
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Barritt
Keith Barritt Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online nondownloadable software for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in the field of vehicle accident prediction and prevention; providing online nondownloadable software for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of driver behavior modelling; providing online nondownloadable software for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of autonomous vehicle communication; providing online nondownloadable software for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of autonomous vehicle safety, security, and reliability; Software as a service (SAAS) services for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in the field of vehicle accident prediction and prevention; Software as a service (SAAS) services for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of driver behavior modelling; software as a service services (SAAS) for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of autonomous vehicle communication; software as a service (SAAS) services for vehicle navigation, for processing and predicting driving conditions to improve handling, for vehicle to infrastructure communication, for vehicle to vehicle communication, for advanced driver assistance systems used in land vehicles, for providing driver behavior information and classification of driving behaviors, for land vehicle sensors to communicate with onboard driver assistance systems, and for use as an application programming interface (API), all in in the field of autonomous vehicle safety, security, and reliability | ACTIVE | Apr 16, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |