Drawing for WAVE ZONE

USPTO serial 87725478

WAVE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WAVE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Backpacks, tote bagsACTIVEJun 16, 2020
021Lunch bags not of paper; thermal insulated cooler bags for food or for beveragesACTIVEJun 16, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 29, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 19, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 26, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance