USPTO serial 87726240
IWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automation systems for homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures comprising wireless and wired controllers for controlling lighting, HVAC units, security goods in the nature of alarm systems; controlled devices in the nature of HVAC units; security systems for homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures comprising doorbell video recorder, video recorders, video servers, electronic glass break detector, motion detector, personal security alarms, smoke detector, door and window sensors for sensing when a door or window is opened; telecommunication base station units for controlling wireless home and personal security devices; electronic doorbells; electronic wireless LAN enabled doorbells; and outdoor security cameras which include an electronic doorbell; security cameras which include a smoke detector alarm alert, electronic doorbell, motion sensor, 2-way audio capability, and infrared night vision; consumer electronic products, namely, doorbells; smoke detectors; carbon monoxide detectors; anti-intrusion alarms; burglar alarms; motion detectors; electronic glass break detectors; remote control units, keypads and control panels for security systems and home automation devices; electronic digital door locks; lights, namely, light systems comprising light sensors and switches; automated lighting installations in a slim design for use on multi-throw switch plates, featuring motion detection, timers, welcome home and random-away lighting features; dual independent electric socket control receptacle, namely, multimedia outlets in the nature of electric multimedia sockets with dual USB ports as well as a backlight and nightlight feature; wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, electronic locks, security systems, lighting systems, garage door openers, electric gates, televisions, cameras, video streaming devices, video recording and video receiving devices, digital video recorders and other electronic devices; electronic locks; entry door systems comprising touch pads; electronic and wireless control panels for security and home automation systems; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to remotely control electronic locks, alarm systems, garage door openers, electric gates, televisions, receivers; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to identify and communicate with persons at their door; Thermostats; Home and office automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, security, safety and other home and office monitoring and control applications; Electric light switches; electronic motion sensitive switches; electronic touch sensitive switches; dashboard cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |